October 8, 1999
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Contact: Jeremiah S. Buckley (202) 349-8010
info@efscouncil.org

    Political Bickering Threatens E-Commerce Future, Says Online Financial Services Trade Group

    WASHINGTON, Oct. 7 -- A national financial services group which focuses on electronic commerce today charged that backroom politics is threatening the future viability of electronic commerce in financial services.

    Cameron King, president of the Electronic Financial Services Council, a trade group for financial services and technology companies with operations over the Internet, said "As the Congressional session draws to a close, Congress and the Administration are grappling with an issue which shouldn't be an issue: whether consumers should be able to obtain financial services on line."

    "Both the House and Senate Commerce Committees have reported legislation which would empower consumers to contract for financial services and to receive related federal and state consumer disclosures on line, but now behind the scenes maneuvering threatens to eliminate this option," asserted King, who is also the senior vice president of E-loan, a Dublin, California-based Internet lender.

"We urge the Clinton Administration and the Congress to face this issue head on. There is no good reason to deny consumers the benefit of on-line financial services, which will be available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week," said King.

"We are concerned that some are urging that consumer financial services be carved out of the digital commerce legislation because some consumers do not yet have computers and may not be able to access this service," noted Catherine Valentine, general counsel of Intuit, Inc. and vice president of the Council.

"Access to the Internet is expanding more rapidly than any technology in recent history. Denying access to financial services on-line to those who currently have computers will not help to eliminate the 'digital divide', which some are citing as a reason not to move forward with this legislation. Indeed, passage of this legislation will empower consumers in all segments of society, in rural areas and inner cities, to secure financial services on-line. This legislation is a must, and we urge the Congress to pass it," said Valentine.

For further discussion see attached memo.

The Electronic Financial Services Council represents a group of financial services and software companies that offer their products and services over the Internet. The Council's mission is to update laws and regulations to facilitate the electronic delivery of financial services. Members include: Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Intuit Inc., GE Capital Mortgage, Microsoft Corporation, Cendant Mortgage, Chase Manhattan Mortgage, Citigroup Mortgage, Inc., E-Loan, The First American Financial Corporation, Freddie Mac, GMAC Mortgage Corporation, Lender Services, Inc., Lending Tree, The Principal Financial Group, United Guaranty, Wells Fargo/Norwest. For additional information, see http://www.efscouncil.org.

 


 

CONSUMERS WILL BENEFIT FROM
FEDERAL ELECTRONIC COMMERCE STANDARDS

Legislation reported by the House and Senate Commerce Committees, H.R. 1714 and S. 761, provide important and needed national standards which will permit consumers to contract electronically for financial services, to receive related state and federal disclosures online, and to obtain electronic records of their financial transactions.

Access to computers and the Internet is already significant and is rising in virtually every segment of the population. Consumers are increasingly turning to the Internet for financial products. A recent study by Forrester Research predicts that the number of households accessing financial services online will grow from 3.3 million current users to 20.9 million users in the next four years. Well over half of the California homeowners looking to refinance use the Internet to compare products and prices.

Electronic media will make it possible for consumer disclosures, records and other information to be provided faster, at a more cost effective rate, and in a more user friendly way than is possible in static paper formats. Increased use of the Internet will give smaller financial institutions equal access to a national marketplace and will empower consumers by providing enhanced product information and access to a broader and more competitive credit marketplace. Online disclosures which facilitate the delivery of financial services and products electronically will provide consumers with significant benefits:

  • Convenience and time-saving. Consumers can conduct transactions virtually anywhere and at any time, 7-days-a-week, 24-hours-a-day. With disclosures being delivered over the world wide web or e-mail, consumers will be able to access the web page or their e-mail account from any computer with standard Internet capabilities.
            
  • Clarity of electronic disclosures. Financial services firms are required by law and regulation to disclose large amounts of information. Electronic records can be organized in a clearer, more rational manner than traditional paper-based disclosures. For example, electronic disclosures containing links to defined terms could make current consumer disclosures more understandable to consumers. Electronic disclosures will also allow consumers to search documents for key words using browsers and other technology. In addition, electronic storage of important disclosures, such as those for mortgages, will provide customers with more easily accessable records.
       
  • More timely and meaningful disclosures. Electronic delivery of consumer notices, contracts, and disclosures will only enhance the effectiveness of existing consumer protection statutes by causing them to be provided in real time in a format that is far more user-friendly than the current stack of papers received by mail days after an application has been filed.
        
  • Enhanced access for under-served persons and communities. People living in under-served communities, both urban and rural, will have enhanced access to financial products and services offered over the Internet, even where brick and mortar branches are not available. Libraries and schools can provide access to computers and the Internet for an increasing number of urban and rural residents. As computer prices continue to drop rapidly, greater numbers of household will gain access to the Internet. Highly publicized efforts to provide lower cost, even free, Internet access will further hasten this trend. Moreover, this increased access should result in lower cost financial services for all consumers, as it is easier for consumers (regardless of location) to use the Internet to compare fees and services offered.
         
  • Lower cost. Provision of electronic disclosures will reduce costs of delivery of financial services, and marketplace competition will result in savings for consumers. For example, it is projected that consumers who start and complete their loan applications over the Internet could save up to a quarter point in origination costs on a mortgage because of the lower overhead and hedging costs facing lenders.
        
  • Substantive consumer protection laws would not be changed. The delivery of federal or state disclosures electronically will not in any way change the rights or responsibilities of any party or affect the content of any disclosure.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE BENEFITS OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE

Some have questioned whether Congress should permit consumers the option of contracting to receive financial services and related disclosures electronically. These arguments against giving consumers this choice fall under the following headings:

  • Digital Divide. It is argued that those who have computers are generally better off than those who do not and that any action taken to enhance availability of services for those who have computers effectively disadvantages those who do not.

Response: Availability of computers and access to the Internet is rapidly expanding to all segments of society. Indeed, the spread of this technology is out pacing all prior technological innovations. This will be hastened by the introduction of new access devices and the increased availability of free Internet service. As with any technology, some earlier adopters of technology will enjoy the benefits before others, but their use of these technologies pave the way for wider availability to all segments of society. Indeed the earlier adopters of a new technology may pay more for the new technology or service until mass production and further innovation ultimately bring down the cost for all users. Should the FCC have denied use of the airwaves to those who bought the first TV's because everyone didn't own one right away?

  • Retainability of Disclosures. Concerns have been expressed that consumers will not have the ability to receive, retain, and print electronic records.

Response: There appears to be a mistaken notion that electronic records do not have the "permanence" of paper records. Not only is this not true, the opposite is likely true. Electronic records can be retained in a much better manner than paper records. Electronic records can be stored, catalogued, and retrieved much more quickly and much more effectively than papers stored in a lender's warehouse or a consumer's file cabinet. Further, most electronic records can be printed on paper and stored in the same manner that such records are held today.

In addition, nothing in the proposed legislation requires consumers to receive disclosures electronically. Both federal and state consumer protection statutes require disclosures to be provided in a format that the consumer may keep. This legislation does not alter these requirements. Consumers that elect to do business online should recognize their ability to receive, retain, and print electronic records. Moreover, consumers who are unable, for whatever reason, to receive or retain documents related to the transaction conducted online, will be able to elect not to do business with a service provider online. Therefore, it is in the industry's best interest legally and economically to ensure that the consumer receives necessary documentation.

  • Integrity of Documents. Concerns have been expressed that disclosures provided electronically could be subject to alteration and could make them difficult to use in court.

Response: The current rules of evidence governing authentication of documents would be applied in the electronic medium. For example, if a consumer challenges the authenticity of a paper document, the burden of proof is shifted to the person who is asserting the authenticity of the document. The same would be true with respect to electronic records. Proposals for a self-authenticating record would create additional administrative requirements that are not currently necessary for paper documents and without improving the reliability of the electronic record.

Electronic commerce is "interstate commerce" in the truest sense of the term; the Internet is a borderless medium. Federal legislation should include strong language to promote uniformity and consistency in electronic records and notices. We urge Congress to move forward with confidence that access to electronic disclosures will empower and inform consumers who are increasingly choosing to use the Internet to access financial services.